|
|
|
photo by Katherine Lambert |
|
|
|
Down to Earth
By working together, unlikely partners
preserve a delicate balance in Mongolia
by Laura Ferguson
photos by Jeff Vermillion
Jeffrey Liebert, A91, can vividly recall the dedication
ceremony this past summer of a stupa, or shrine, at the ruins
of a Buddhist monastery in Mongolia, one of many destroyed
during the Stalinist purges of the 1930s.
“It’s hard to imagine, but the location of the
monastery is as remote as it gets—5,000 households in
a 14,000-square-mile area is very sparsely populated,” he
says. “On the day of the ceremony, close to 1,000 people
came to pay tribute. We counted more than 500 horses tied to
improvised hitching posts. It’s also one of the only
monasteries in the world that’s multidenominational.
The Buddhists gathered in a circle to listen to the monks chant,
while citizens who practiced shamanist traditions formed a
circle around the shamans. Then suddenly the Mongolian prime
minister landed in a helicopter, creating enormous excitement.
It was an unforgettable moment.”
That indelible memory is one of many Liebert shares as he talks
about a five-year, $2.5 million conservation project that he
developed to protect the taimen, or Siberian salmon.
Liebert is the first to admit there is not an obvious affinity
between rebuilding a Buddhist monastery and protecting an endangered
fish.
But that seeming incongruence illuminates a point at the center
of his international work: everything is in fact interrelated.
What ecologists call the web of life has proved profoundly
important in an unusual partnership between American fly-fishermen,
Buddhist monks, and University of Wisconsin biologists.
It’s part of a holistic “faith-based” approach
to conservation one might not normally associate with those
in the banking trade. Liebert, an investment officer with the
International Finance Corporation (IFC), the private-sector
investment arm of the World Bank based in Washington DC, falls
into that category—somewhat. A former Peace Corps volunteer
in Mongolia, he is fluent in Mongolian and Russian, has a “pretty
good”grasp of Mandarin, and possesses a kind of “let’s
get it done” attitude that’s well tempered by a
respect for other cultures and traditions. The friendships
and connections he has developed over the many years of his
affiliation with Mongolia, China, and Russia make a huge difference
in his ability to get things done.
“I will always be an outsider in these countries,” he
says, “but a very knowledgeable and empathetic outsider.
It makes a difference in my ability to work there effectively.”
Indeed, that experience and skill has been useful in his work
helping establish the Taimen Conservation Fund (TCF), a local
nongovernmental organization based in Mongolia. TCF’s
approach to cultural preservation promotes sustainable economic
development while also honoring the ancient nomadic culture
of northwestern Mongolia. For Liebert, who initiated, drafted,
developed, and submitted the taimen conservation project for
funding, building that connection between cultural preservation
and environmental conservation has been satisfying both professionally
and personally.
“The dedication of the stupa was a very special moment
for me, as I felt that I had not imposed a foreign concept
on the people,” he says. “Rather, they adapted
their own beliefs to a form of conservation that made sense
to them.”
Dan Vermillion, co-owner of Sweetwater Travel, a fishing expedition
company in Montana that leads catch-and-release fly-fishing
tours in Mongolia, credits Liebert with having the knack to
bridge what could have been a difficult cultural divide.
“There is no question that this project would not have
gotten off the ground without his effort,” he says. “He
helped us get more focused on how we do our business in Mongolia
and how we can support the local communities. He’s exceptionally
passionate and effective at accomplishing a project in an area
as complicated as the Mongolian outback. He was able to integrate
all three interests into one coherent project that is working
really well.”
Jake Vander Zanden, an assistant professor of zoology at the
University of Wisconsin–Madison, is head of the science
team in Mongolia; with TCF he is developing a science-based
management plan to protect the taimen population.
“Jeff realized the significance of the taimen as a delicate
and important species that needs to be conserved based on scientific
information,” says Vander Zanden. “That he had
the vision to pull all these different ideas together was outstanding.
It’s one of the rare cases where it’s a win-win
for everybody. So often in these situations different interests
are at loggerheads, but Jeff had the vision to construct the
project so that they’re all lined up in the same direction.
And he’s such an energetic guy. I think he’s going
to explode sometimes! But that also makes him fun to work with.”
Navigating the subtleties of different cultures comes naturally
to Liebert, who graduated from Tufts with a double degree
in international relations and Russian studies. Following
graduation he lived in Russia, where he witnessed the influx
of foreign entrepreneurs eager to work deals and take advantage
of new market opportunities. When he joined the Peace Corps
in 1992, he was assigned to Mongolia to help entrepreneurs
establish small businesses.
“The experience was absolutely overwhelming,” he
recalls. “Herds of sheep were roaming in the capital
city’s central square. The whole country seemed to smell
of mutton. The Mongolians were really struggling with keeping
the coal mines and power plants running. It was an amazing
experience to witness the birth of a country, political parties,
and traders and currency speculators turning into millionaires
overnight.”
After the Peace Corps, Liebert stayed on to work in the region
for six more years, when his work included running American
cashmere factories before he returned to the United States
to enroll in the Wharton School of Business. With a newly
minted MBA, he was attracted to the innovative work being
done at IFC.
“I grew up in Seattle, and I watched my state destroy
its rivers, mostly through logging and unsustainable development,” he
says. “I always thought that if I had the opportunity
to work in a different country at an earlier stage of development,
it was my obligation to help prevent that from happening again.
The types of projects that I’m investing in at IFC not
only provide direct benefits to impoverished communities, they
also leave a minimal human footprint on the environment. One
of the recent companies I invested in, WaterHealth International,
is sending 50 water disinfection and purification devices to
the affected areas in Southeast Asia following the tsunami.”
Formal conservation programs are still a relatively new
idea in Mongolia. Historically, the country has been so sparsely
populated that the human footprint on the land has been minimal.
Often described as “a last frontier,” Mongolia
is a newly democratic nation where tourism is now starting
to take off, a boon that brings with it a balancing act:
pursuing rapid economic development while also preserving
ancient traditions and pristine natural resources.
“There is a right way and a wrong way to development,” says
Liebert. “In the past, it always meant scarifying the
environment for economic gain. But in Mongolia as in Bhutan,
where more than ten percent of revenues come from tourism,
the way you manage your natural resources is very important.
Mongolia is an exotic and interesting place and a lot of people
want to see it. So the question becomes, How do you maximize
your returns without destroying what makes it such a fantastic
destination? That is the million-dollar question.”
One such valued natural resource that is at stake is the
taimen, a fish that can measure as much as six feet and weigh
up to 200 pounds, making it the world’s largest salmonid
(a classification that includes salmon and trout). The taimen
have long been protected from the world; their remote Mongolian
rivers are simply too difficult to access. But increasingly,
poachers with nets, dynamite, and four-wheel-drive vehicles
have been catching the fish illegally for sport and for urban
markets. Gold mining is also increasingly threatening its
habitat.
“Taimen populations have declined dramatically from poaching,
pollution, and the building of dams,” says Vander Zanden. “We’re
currently assessing its global conservation status, but it
is either threatened or endangered across its range, which
includes parts of Russia, Mongolia, and China.”
Part of the vulnerability of the taimen, says Vander Zanden,
is that its size makes it a highly sought after species.
But the species also reproduces late in life, and with a
shortened reproductive span, any decline in fish populations
can be devastating if the population does not have time to
recover.
Tour operators have been attracted to the area for obvious
reasons. Fly-fishermen are eager for a chance to catch and
release the majestic fish. And, adds Vermillion, it’s
one of the unique places in the world for coldwater fishing
due to the fortuitous combination of the size of the fish,
the beautiful scenery, and the people.
“This is about the only place in the world that you can
fly-fish and be part of a fascinating and untouched culture,” he
says. “Usually fishing lodges are far removed from communities,
but here we’re close to an informal network of families
living throughout the little valleys, where in some cases you
find families
that go back 20 generations. It’s their home and they
could not be more hospitable.”
Still, there were concerns. While the sport fishing expeditions
bring substantial financial resources to a poor country,
generating as much as $5,000 per fly-fisherman for a week
of fishing, the Buddhist communities find the notion of catch-and-release
fishing at odds with their belief in avoiding harm to any
living thing.
Apossible solution emerged after tourist operators for fishing
companies approached IFC. Liebert, with his wealth of experience
in Mongolia, was a natural fit. He proposed an innovative
concession system strategy: protect the fish by dividing
the river into natural resource user zones, such as high-use
zones and low-use zones, depending on river characteristics,
and “restricted” zones, where fish are spawning.
Fishing companies would participate in a competitive bidding
system for exclusive long-term user rights and pay annual
fees to local communities for access to their particular
zones.
The idea of “concessioning” a river based on
specific uses of the natural resource and tied to a physical
zone on the river, says Liebert, seemed a sensible strategy
in the effort to avoid the “tragedy of the commons” problem.
If the river doesn’t have clear ownership rights and
proper enforcement, there is a perverse incentive among competing
user groups to overexploit a public good.
“Concessions are really about determining the most economically
advantageous use of the river, based on what we know about
the resilience of the habitat and the fish,” says Liebert. “It’s
essentially the same system the Grand Canyon National Park
employs to allocate a limited number of licenses to competing
river-rafting companies. Sustainable tourism, or ecotourism,
is based on the principle that certain natural resources of
particular value left in a wild state can have a competitive
financial rate of return if their use is limited and managed
properly, rather than being treated as a high-use public good.
It’s simply applying basic microeconomic theory from
my entry-level economics class at Tufts.”
It is not, however, a quick sell in a country of nomadic
tribes, few fences, and no history of private-property ownership.
So Liebert helped put together a proposal that looked at
the issue from the inside out. IFC teamed up with the World
Wildlife Fund to help understand the environmental challenges
facing communities and cultural attitudes toward tourism
in a wider context. The taimen were not the only vulnerable
resource; local mammals and forest resources were disappearing,
too.
At public meetings, the team explained that the project would
bring a credible system of sustainable management to the
resources in the watershed. Fishing-company concession fees
would go into a local fund to cover the costs of administering
the management systems, training rangers to police against
poaching, and bringing in Western-trained scientists to develop
a natural resource use plan. Any additional revenues would
be allocated to social services, such as schools and hospitals.
Liebert says the meetings opened up a dialogue with community
members whose attitudes were not unlike those one might hear
expressed in the American West. “I have always believed
that a Mongolian nomad and a Montana rancher have more in
common than a city slicker from either country,” he
says. “Mongolians are open, very friendly, and fiercely
individualistic. Though Mongolia and Timbuktu are often referred
to as the proverbial middle of nowhere, anybody who has spent
time in Mongolia will quickly recognize that it’s only
the geographic distance that separates Mongolians from Western
cultures.”
Science has also played a large part in the success of the
project and will have profound implications for the taimen’s
future. Part of Vander Zanden’s assignment is training
Mongolian graduate students to do field work, the “next
generation” to carry on the task.
Vander Zanden’s team, including a University of Wisconsin
graduate student, David Gilroy, now living in Mongolia, is
also conducting the first-of-its-kind study of the migratory
patterns and spawning behavior of this species. They surgically
implant a radio tag into the gut of each fish. The tag will
transmit a specific code that scientists can pick up using
receiving devices.
“We will be tracking these fish for the next five years,
finding out where they are moving, their migrating patterns,
and when they disappear,” explains Vander Zanden. “This
is providing basic information that will determine how the
concession system will be configured. Using this information,
we’ll build a mathematical model of the population. We’ll
then run simulations to determine the best approach, because
we don’t want to do anything to cause the population
to decline. That’s what’s so satisfying. The work
we’re doing is feeding into something that will improve
how this important resource is managed.”
It was clear from the start, despite best intentions, that
notions about protecting the fish could be divisive. Buddhist
culture reveres all living things, worshiping rivers, mountains,
and animals. An ancient sutra warns that for every fish killed,
999 human souls will suffer, according to an article on the
project in a recent issue of the Wall Street Journal. And
people who mistreat rivers “risk the wrath of temperamental
water spirits known as Lus. Their punishment: flood, famine,
and skin infections.”
Buddhist community members and monks had to be convinced
that the catch-and-release fishing did not hurt the fish
or provoke the anger of the river. Sport fishing itself,
in which tourists hook the fish in the mouth and pull it
from the water for a quick photograph, did not square with
Buddhist beliefs. “It’s difficult for the monks
to see the fish removed from the river or stressed in any
way,” says Liebert. “We did explain that the
fish has no nerves in its mouth, which is made of cartilage.
The issue of harm arises less from the hook itself than from
hauling the fish close to shore. That’s why for every
two people there is always one guide who is responsible for
expertly handling the fish and returning it to the river.”
A 26-year-old Buddhist monk named Gantulga proved instrumental
as well. Assigned to the project by the Mongolian equivalent
of Tibet’s Dalai Lama, he helped communicate traditional
cultural and Buddhist beliefs about conservation to local
communities.
As one of a younger generation of Mongolians, Gantulga was
open to the dialogue. “The monks I worked with are
a dichotomy of old and new,” says Liebert. “They
use multiple cell phones, yet are a storehouse of traditional
values and beliefs. They have adapted their outreach to a
changing world.”
Mr. Erdenebat, director of the Taimen Conservation Fund,
noted that because Liebert lived in the Mongolian countryside
for five years, his respect and understanding for the culture
facilitated that dialogue. “He knows the Mongolian
way of life and tradition better then many Mongolians who
have grown up in the city,” says Erdenebat. “He
is a good advisor and the success of the project is the result
of his hard work.”
As an added incentive, project planners established a third-party
nonprofit organization that will accept donations from Western
visitors to help restore Gandan Monastery in Ulaanbaatar.
Construction, which began last spring, is considered the
first step not only in rebuilding the monastery, but also
in generating buy-in from the local community. The reconstruction
of the monastery establishes the credibility of the project,
and represents a commitment to respecting traditional cultural
values, says Liebert.
“Buddhism was banned under Mongolia’s communist
rule,” he explains. “It’s now witnessing
a tremendous resurgence, and rebuilding a monastery is both
a symbolic and a practical gesture of great significance. It’s
an effort that also connects the activity of catch-and-release
fly-fishing with beliefs that are proconservation. It happened
to be a very powerful argument.”
And perhaps there is no better testament to how well the
Mongolians think of Liebert than the small ceremony that
occurred one day after he had helped a ranger tag a taimen.
Before each fish is released back to the river, they are
given a name to show respect and gratitude.
“There’s now one named Jeff,” says Liebert,
with a laugh. “It’s out there somewhere, hopefully,
and will only have to endure a few nonlethal games of pull
and tug with some tourists throughout its life. That’s
a small price to pay for the survival of the species.”
For more information on the work being done by the Taimen
Conservation Fund, visit www.taimen.org.
|